Pilot test to assess the translated and culturally adapted versions into Colombian Spanish of the KOOS-JR, KOOS-12, HOOS-JR and HOOS-12 questionnaires
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58814/01208845.66Keywords:
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Quality of Life, PainAbstract
Introduction: Assessing the symptoms and impact of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and hip osteoarthritis (HOA) on functional capacity and quality of life is paramount to determine the effectiveness of treatment and improve clinical outcomes.
Objectives: To describe the translation and cultural adaptation process into Colombian Spanish of the KOOS-12, KOOS-JR, HOOS-12, and HOOS-JR questionnaires; to present the results of their use in a pilot test carried out to evaluate the understanding of the items; and to report the results obtained in these versions by patients with KOA and HOA in terms of functionality, pain, and quality of life.
Methodology: Descriptive study. We first describe the translation and adaptation process into Colombian Spanish of the KOOS-12, HOOS-12, KOOS-JR, and HOOS-JR questionnaires. Then, the results of a pilot test in which the Colombian Spanish versions of these questionnaires were administered to 55 patients with KOA (n=37) and HOA (n=18) are reported. Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) was used to evaluate the correlations between the scores obtained with these instruments (global and domain scores) and the scores obtained using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the SF-36 health survey domains.
Results: The overall scores on the KOOS-12, KOOS-JR, HOOS-12, and HOOS-JR were 42.7, 46.5, 39.6, and 38.3, respectively. In the case of the KOOS-12 and HOOS-12 questionnaires, the score in each of their domains (pain, function in activities of daily living, and quality of life) never exceeded 50 points. Regarding the correlations between the scores obtained in the SF36 survey domains and the scores obtained in the four questionnaires, it was observed that they were very weak-weak relative to the total KOOS-12 score (rho= 0.2-0. 4), with the exception of the social function domain (rho= 0.5); very weak-weak for the KOOS-JR score (rho= 0.1-0.4); moderate-strong (rho= 0.5-0.8) for the HOOS-12 total score, with the exception of the vitality dimension (rho= 0.3); and very weak, weak, moderate, and strong for the HOOS-JR score.
Conclusion: According to the results of the pilot test, it can be stated that the versions translated and adapted into Colombian Spanish of the KOOS-12, HOOS-12, KOOS-JR, and HOOS-JR questionnaires presented here could be used to evaluate the impact of KOA and HOA in the country in terms of pain, function in activities of daily living, and quality of life. However, their validation process needs to be completed.
Downloads
References
Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:646-56.
Kloppenburg M, Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020;28:242-8. https://doi.org/gh63zv.
March L, Cross M. Epidemiology and risk factors for osteoarthritis. UpToDate. 2020. Available from: https://bit.ly/4dlc6O5.
O’Neill TW, McCabe PS, McBeth J. Update on the epidemiology, risk factors and disease outcomes of osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018;32(2):312-26. doi: https://doi.org/gjn5wz.
Gandek B, Roos EM, Franklin PD, Ware JE Jr. Item selection for 12-item short forms of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27:746-53. https://doi.org/gq778k.
Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Cross MB, Padgett DE. Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(6):1461-71. https://doi.org/mtpv.
Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Mayman DJ, Padgett DE. Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(6):1472-82. https://doi.org/gk6drp.
Mokkink LB, Vet HC, Prinsen CA, Patrick D, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171-9. https://doi.org/gdd5ws.
American College of Rheumatology. Osteoarthritis Guideline American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee - 2019. United States; 2019. https://bit.ly/4dqLICk.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-83.
Lugo LH, García HI, Gómez C. Confiabilidad del cuestionario de calidad de vida en salud SF-36 en Medellín, Colombia. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2006;24(2):37-50.
Jensen M, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003;4(7):407-14. https://doi.org/fnp7rd.
Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 5thed. London: Houghton Mifflin; 2003. Available from: https://bit.ly/3y0rLCd.
World Medical Association (WMA). WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza: 64th WMA General Assembly; 2013.
Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Resolución 8430 de 1993 (octubre 4): Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Bogotá D.C.; octubre 4 de 1993 [cited 2023 Aug 31]. Available at: https://bit.ly/31gu7do.
Katz JN, Arant KR, Loeser RF. Diagnosis and Treatment of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review. JAMA. 2021;325(6):568-78. https://doi.org/gh2p2p.
Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019.;393(10182):1745-59. https://doi.org/gf3c84.
Solis Cartas U, Calvopiña Bejarano SJ, Martínez Larrarte JP, Paguay Moreno AR, Saquipay Duchitanga GI. Perception of quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. A 5 year study. Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition) 2018;25(3):177-83. https://doi.org/mtp5.
Vina ER, Kwoh CK. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: literature update. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018;30:160-7. https://doi.org/gc936p.
Allen KD, Thoma LM, Golightly YM. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022;30(2):184-95. https://doi.org/gnjhhg.
Raposo F, Ramos M, Lúcia Cruz A. Effects of exercise on knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care. 2021;19(4):399-435. https://doi.org/gqz25m.
Gómez-Valero S, García-Pérez F, Flórez-García MT, Miangolarra-Page JC. A systematic review of self-administered questionnaires for the functional assessment of patients with knee disabilities adapted into Spanish. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017;61(2):96-103. https://doi.org/mtz6.
Lizaur-Utilla A, Miralles-Muñoz FA, Gonzalez-Parreño S, Lopez-Prats FA. Validation of the Spanish Version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for Elderly Patients With Total Knee Replacement. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(10):2157-62. https://doi.org/mtp7.
Putman S, Migaud H, Pasquier G, Girard J, Preda C, Duhamel A. Does change in language change the properties of a shortened score previously validated in its complete version? Validation of the French versions of the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 scores in primary knee and hip arthroplasties. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(3):102824. https://doi.org/m34c.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Colombiana de ortopedia y traumatología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
