Surgical treatment of SLAP tears: labrum repair versus biceps tenodesis. A systematic review

Authors

  • Sara España Fernández-de Valderrama Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma Service, Zaragoza, España.
  • Jorge Ripalda-Marín Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma Service, Zaragoza, España.
  • Ignacio Carbonel-Bueno Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma Service, Zaragoza, España.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58814/01208845.582

Keywords:

SLAP Tears, Tenodesis, Repair, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis

Abstract

Introduction: In the past, biceps tenodesis was the go-to technique for treating SLAP lesions in older patients with lower functional demands, while arthroscopic labrum repair was preferred in young, active individuals. However, there is still debate about which technique to select.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of biceps tenodesis and labrum repair in the treatment of SLAP tears.

Methodology: This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Systematic searches were conducted in December 2024 in Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane to find clinical trials and observational studies published in the last 10 years that compared both treatments in terms of efficacy and safety. The meta-analysis was performed in RevMan using a fixed-effect model when heterogeneity was <50% and a random-effects model if it was >50%. A statistical significance level of p<0.05 was considered.

Results: Ten retrospective observational (cohort) studies were included. The mean age in both groups was <40 years in six studies and ≥40 years in three. In the remaining study, the mean age was <40 years in the tenodesis group and ≥40 years in the labrum repair group. Postoperative pain (VAS score) was significantly lower in patients who underwent tenodesis [mean difference (MD): -0.29, 95%CI: -0.50 to -0.07, p=0.010]. No differences were found between groups in the ASES score (MD: 0.72, 95%CI: -1.61 to 3.05, p=0.54), the rate of return to sports (RR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.97 to 1.21, p=0.15), or the reoperation rate (RR: 0.41, 95%CI: 0.17 to 1.01, p=0.05).

Conclusions: Regardless of age, there are no significant differences between biceps tenodesis and labrum repair for the treatment of SLAP tears in terms of the patient’s subjective perception on functional scales, rate of return to sports activity, and reoperation rate. Postoperative pain was significantly lower in the biceps tenodesis group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Pizzo W Del, Ferkel RD, Friedman MJ. SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 1990;6(4):274-9. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(90)90056-j. PMID: 2264894.

Chalmers PN, Monson B, Frank RM, Mascarenhas R, Nicholson GP, Bach BR, et al. Combined SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis for superior labral anterior–posterior tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(12):3870-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3774-6. PMID: 26328801.

Varacallo MA, Tapscott DC, Mair SD. Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Lesions. 2023. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. PMID: 30855868.

Li X, Lin TJ, Jager M, Price MD, Deangelis NA, et al. Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2010;2(1):e6. doi: 10.4081/or.2010.e6. PMID: 21808701; PMCID: PMC3143955.

Steinmetz RG, Guth JJ, Matava MJ, Brophy RH, Smith MV. Return to play following nonsurgical management of superior labrum anterior-posterior tears: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(6):1323-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.022. PMID: 35063641.6.

Weick JW, Workman WB, Bush CJ, McCollum KA, Sugaya H, Freehill MT. Reported Technical Aspects of Type II SLAP Lesion Repairs in Athletes. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021;3(2):e289-e296. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.003. PMID: 34027434; PMCID: PMC8128993.

Patzer T, Habermeyer P, Hurschler C, Bobrowitsch E, Wellmann M, Kircher J, et al. The influence of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair on restoring baseline glenohumeral translation and increased biceps loading after simulated SLAP tear and the effectiveness of SLAP repair after long head of biceps tenotomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(11):1580-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.005. PMID: 22365557.

Strauss EJ, Salata MJ, Sershon RA, Garbis N, Provencher MT, Wang VM, et al. Role of the superior labrum after biceps tenodesis in glenohumeral stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(4):485-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.036. PMID: 24090980.

Rossy W, Sanchez G, Sanchez A, Provencher MT. Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior (SLAP) Tears in the Military. Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 2016;8(6):503-6. doi: 10.1177/1941738116671693. PMID: 27765830; PMCID: PMC5089360.

Goncharov EN, Koval OA, Bezuglov EN, Vetoshkin AA, Goncharov NG, Ramirez MJE, et al. A Comparative Analysis Between Conservative Treatment, Arthroscopic Repair, and Biceps Tenodesis in Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior (SLAP) Lesions. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e47512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47512. PMID: 38022173; PMCID: PMC10663969.

Snyder SJ, Banas MP, Karzel RP. An analysis of 140 injuries to the superior glenoid labrum. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4(4):243-8. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(05)80015-1. PMID: 8542365.

Aydin N, Sirin E, Arya A. Superior labrum anterior to posterior lesions of the shoulder: Diagnosis and arthroscopic management. World J Orthop. 2014;5(3):344-50. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.344. PMID: 25035838; PMCID: PMC4095028.

LeVasseur MR, Mancini MR, Hawthorne BC, Romeo AA, Calvo E, Mazzocca AD. SLAP tears and return to sport and work: current concepts. J ISAKOS. 2021;6(4):204-11. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000537. PMID: 34272296.

Ren YM, Duan YH, Sun YB, Yang T, Hou WY, Tian MQ. Is arthroscopic repair superior to biceps tenotomy and tenodesis for type II SLAP lesions? A meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1096-y. PMID: 30760293; PMCID: PMC6375148.

Erickson BJ, Jain A, Abrams GD, Nicholson GP, Cole BJ, Romeo AA, et al. SLAP Lesions: Trends in Treatment. Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):976-81. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.044. PMID: 26907371.

Hurley ET, Fat DL, Duigenan CM, Miller JC, Mullett H, Moran CJ. Biceps tenodesis versus labral repair for superior labrum anterior-to-posterior tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(10):1913-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.011. PMID: 29803502.

Hurley ET, Baker R, Danilkowicz RM, Levin JM, Klifto CS, Dickens JF, et al. Similar outcomes between biceps tenodesis and SLAP repair for SLAP tears in younger patients - A meta-analysis. J ISAKOS. 2024;9(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.09.007. PMID: 37797939.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. PMID: 33782057; PMCID: PMC8005924.

Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2021.

Review Manager (RevMan). Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2014.

Denard PJ, Lädermann A, Parsley BK, Burkhart SS. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis compared with repair of isolated type II SLAP lesions in patients older than 35 years. Orthopedics. 2014;37(3):e292-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140225-63. PMID: 24762158.

Lim S, Kim SK, Kim YS. Comparison between SLAP Repair and Biceps Tenodesis with Concomitant Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Older than 45 Years: Minimum 2-Year Clinical and Imaging Outcomes. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020;12(3):364-370. doi: 10.4055/cios19157. PMID: 32904029; PMCID: PMC7449846.

Dunne KF, Knesek M, Tjong VK, Riederman BD, Cogan CJ, Baker HP, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of type II superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions in a younger population: minimum 2-year outcomes are similar between SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(1):257-65. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05971-0. PMID: 32253479.

Ridley TJ, Horan MP, Nolte PC, Elrick BP, Millett PJ. Concomitant Biceps Tenodesis Improves Outcomes for SLAP Repair: Minimum 2-Year Clinical Outcomes after SLAP II-IV Repair Versus Tenodesis Versus Both. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021;3(6):e2007-14. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.007. PMID: 34977660; PMCID: PMC8689264.

Parnes N, Dunn JC, Czajkowski H, DeFranco MJ, Green CK, Scanaliato JP. Biceps Tenodesis as an Attractive Alternative to Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior (SLAP) Repair for Type II SLAP Lesions in Active-Duty Military Patients Younger Than 35 Years. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(14):3945-51. doi: 10.1177/03635465211049373. PMID: 34672809.

Lacheta L, Horan MP, Nolte PC, Goldenberg BT, Dekker TJ, Millett PJ. SLAP Repair Versus Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Isolated SLAP Type 2 Lesions in Overhead Athletes Younger Than 35 Years: Comparison of Minimum 2-Year Outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(6):23259671221105239. doi: 10.1177/23259671221105239. PMID: 35757237; PMCID: PMC9218463.

Song Y, Wu Z, Wang M, Liu S, Cong R, Tao K. Arthroscopic Modified Double-Row Biceps Tenodesis versus Labral Repair for the Treatment of Isolated Type II SLAP Lesions in Non-Overhead Athletes. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(7):1340-49. doi: 10.1111/os.13229. PMID: 35633041; PMCID: PMC9251294.

Rothermich MA, Ryan MK, Fleisig GS, Layton BO, Mussell EA, Andrews JR, et al. Clinical outcomes and return to play in softball players following SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023;32(5):924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.025. PMID: 36442830.

Schrøder CP, Skare Ø, Reikerås O, Mowinckel P, Brox JI. Sham surgery versus labral repair or biceps tenodesis for type II SLAP lesions of the shoulder: a three-armed randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(24):1759-66. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097098. PMID: 28495804; PMCID: PMC5754846.

Martínez-Cano JP, Llinás PJ, Escobar SS, López R, Caicedo Álvaro, Herrera G. Validación de la versión en español para Colombia de la escala ASES. RELART. 2022;29(01):22-27.

Ahmed R, Lanham NS, Peterson JR, Jobin CM, Levine WN. Characterization of ASES score pain and functional improvement after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a patient-centered perspective. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(5):1042-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.031. PMID: 34808350.

Sandler AB, Scanaliato JP, Baird MD, Dunn JC, Parnes N. Lower Reoperation and Higher Return-to-Sport Rates After Biceps Tenodesis Versus SLAP Repair in Young Patients: A Systematic Review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4(5):e1887-95. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.07.004. PMID: 36312714; PMCID: PMC9596896.

Civan O, Bilsel K, Kapicioglu M, Ozenci AM. Repair versus biceps tenodesis for the slap tears: A systematic review. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021;29(2):23094990211004794. doi: 10.1177/23094990211004794. PMID: 33882738.

de SA D, Arakgi ME, Lian J, Crum RJ, Lin A, Lesniak BP. Labral Repair Versus Biceps Tenodesis for Primary Surgical Management of Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior Tears: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(6):1927-38. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.12.015. PMID: 31053457.

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

1.
España Fernández-de Valderrama S, Ripalda-Marín J, Carbonel-Bueno I. Surgical treatment of SLAP tears: labrum repair versus biceps tenodesis. A systematic review. Rev. Colomb. Ortop. Traumatol. [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 5 [cited 2026 Mar. 14];39:e582. Available from: https://revistasccotorg.biteca.online/index.php/rccot/article/view/582

Issue

Section

Systematic review and/or metaanalysis
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo
Escanea para compartir
QR Code

Some similar items: