Management of diaphyseal femur fracture non-union with an antirotatory plate osteosynthesis

Authors

  • Alfredo Martínez Rondanelli Fundación Valle del Lili. Cali, Colombia
  • Jenny Patricia Holguín Prieto Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia
  • Diana Marcela Duque Ospina Hospital Universitario del Valle. Cali, Colombia
  • Juan Pablo Martínez Cano Fundación Valle del Lili. Cali, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0120-8845(13)70013-0

Keywords:

femoral fractures, fractures, non-union, fracture fixation, intramedullary, bone nails, bone transplantation, fracture healing, retrospective studies, evidence level: IV

Abstract

Introduction: Every year, there are 250 patients admitted with femoral shaft fracture at our institution. For patients treated with reamed and locked femoral nails, the non-union rate is between 10 to 15%, similar to worldwide incidence. Treating non-union is a challenge because healing rates are of only 50–80% with actual techniques. A novel technique is presented: augmentation with an antirotatory plate.
Materials and methods: We conducted a case series study at two university hospitals, collecting information from patients with diaphyseal femur fracture non-union, treated with antirotatory plate and bone grafts between 1997 and 2008. Clinical and radiological variables were assessed.
Results: 47 patients entered the study, with 48 nonunion fractures of the femoral shaft that had been treated with reamed intramedullary interlocking nail. 30 fractures (62%) had required an open reduction. The average age was 37 years. 44 fractures (92%) healed 6 months after treatment with antirotatory plate and autologous bone grafts.
Discussion: This method promotes both biology and mechanics in the fracture site, allowing bone healing and return to normal activities in a high percentage. We recommend it for the treatment of femoral non-union. Further prospective research may confirm the safety and effectivity of this treatment.

Downloads

Author Biographies

Alfredo Martínez Rondanelli, Fundación Valle del Lili. Cali, Colombia

Profesor titular de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Universidad del Valle. Jefe de la Unidad de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.

Jenny Patricia Holguín Prieto, Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia

Residente de 4.° año de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.

Diana Marcela Duque Ospina, Hospital Universitario del Valle. Cali, Colombia

Médica asistencial de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario del Valle, Cali, Colombia.

Juan Pablo Martínez Cano, Fundación Valle del Lili. Cali, Colombia

Ortopedista y traumatólogo, Epidemiólogo clínico, Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.

References

Villanueva E, Sanguesa MJ. Refractura Femoral en un miembro poliomielitico port ador de un clavo intramedular. Avances Traum. 2003;33(1):60-61

Schat zker J, Tile M, edit ores. The rat ionale of operat ive fracture care. 2.ª ed. New York: Springer; 1998.

Canale ST. Campbell cirugía ortopédica. 10.ª ed. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2004.

Malagón V, Sot o D. Compendio de ort opedia y fract uras. Bogotá: Editorial Médica Celsus; 1994.

Banaszkiewicz PA, Sabboubeh A, McLeod I, Maffulli N. Femoral exchange nailing for aseptic non-union: not the end to all problems. Injury. 2003;34(5):349-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00191-2

Kanakaris NK, Lasanianos N, Calori GM, Verdonk R, Blokhuis TJ, Cherubino P. Application of bone morphogenetic proteins to femoral non-unions: A 4-year multicenter experience. Inj ury. 2009;40 Suppl 3:S54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(09)70013-0

Megas P, Syggelos SA, Kontakis G, Giannakopoulos A, Skouteris G, Lambiris E. Int ramedullary nailing for t he t reat ment of asept ic femoral shaft non-unions aft er plat ing failure: Effectiveness and timing. Injury. 2009;40(7):732-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.11.008

Furlong AJ, Giannoudis PV, DeBoer P, Matthews SJ, MacDonald DA, Smit h RM. Exchange nailing for femoral shaft asept ic non-union. Injury. 1999;30(4):245-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00073-X

Lynch JR, Tait sman LA, Barei DP, Nork SE. Femoral nonunion: risk factors and treatment options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(2):88-97. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200802000-00006

Brinker MR, O'Connor DP. Exchange nailing of united fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:177-88. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00742

Ueng SW, Chao EK, Lee SS, Shih CH. Augment at ive plat e fixat ion for t he management of femoral nonunion aft er intramedullary nailing. J Trauma. 1997;43:640-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199710000-00013

Ueng SW, Shih CH. Augment at ive plat e fixat ion for t he management of femoral nonunion with broken interlocking nail. J Trauma. 1998;45(4):747-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199810000-00021

Martínez RA, Alegría VC. Evaluación del trat amiento de las fracturas diaÞ sarias del fémur con clavo bloqueado. Rev Col Or Tra. 2001;15(2):31-8.

el Moumni M, Leenhout s PA, t en Duis HJ, Wendt KW. The incidence of non-union following unreamed int ramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fract ures. Inj ur y. 2009;40(2): 205-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.022

Published

2013-09-25

How to Cite

1.
Martínez Rondanelli A, Holguín Prieto JP, Duque Ospina DM, Martínez Cano JP. Management of diaphyseal femur fracture non-union with an antirotatory plate osteosynthesis. Rev. Colomb. Ortop. Traumatol. [Internet]. 2013 Sep. 25 [cited 2025 May 16];27(3):160-5. Available from: https://revistasccotorg.biteca.online/index.php/rccot/article/view/481

Issue

Section

Original research
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views