Biomechanical analysis of a support system for proximal femur nail in an intertrochanteric fracture model

Authors

  • I.D. Serna Maya Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia
  • M. Toro Restrepo Industrias Médicas Sampedro. Sabaneta, Colombia
  • T. Ríos Meneses Industrias Médicas Sampedro. Sabaneta, Colombia
  • D. Sierra Navarro Industrias Médicas Sampedro. Sabaneta, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rccot.2016.02.005

Keywords:

compression fatigue test, proximal femur, intertrochanteric fractures, intramedullary fixation

Abstract

Introduction: The intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur are presented mostly due to trauma in the elderly. The incidence of these fractures has been increasing in frequency in recent years due to the aging of the population. The purpose of this study was to determine the fatigue performance of the branded Support system for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur by biomechanical analysis.
Materials and methods: The analysis was performed on synthetic bone models with intertrochanteric fractures. The mechanical characteristics of the system were first determined using a static compression test, and then compression fatigue tests were performed to complete one million cycles or until a displacement of the femoral head of greater than 5 mm was produced.
Results: The results show that the fatigue strength of the Support system is sufficient in order to be able to withstand the loads to which it is subjected during the time from surgery to fracture healing.
Discussion: Further work is recommended to evaluate the performance ofthe system, where the main action of the muscles acting on the hip joint and in a simulated physiological environment is considered.
Evidence level IV.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

I.D. Serna Maya, Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia

Médico Ortopedista, Servicios de Salud, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia

M. Toro Restrepo, Industrias Médicas Sampedro. Sabaneta, Colombia

Ingeniero MSc, Industrias Médicas Sampedro, Sabaneta, Antioquia, Colombia.

T. Ríos Meneses, Industrias Médicas Sampedro. Sabaneta, Colombia

Ingeniera, Industrias Médicas Sampedro, Sabaneta, Antioquia, Colombia.

D. Sierra Navarro, Industrias Médicas Sampedro. Sabaneta, Colombia

Ingeniero MSc, Industrias Médicas Sampedro, Sabaneta, Antioquia, Colombia.

References

Gava R, Pérez-Hernández D, Corona-Fernández C, García-García J, Hernández-Vaquero D. Clavo Gamma en el tratamiento de las fracturas del macizo trocantérico. Estudio comparativo entre el clavo Gamma trocantérico y el Gamma 3. Rev Esp Cir Osteoart. 2005;40:7-12.

Formiga F, Pujol R. Mortalidad por fractura de fémur: analizando las causas de un viejo problema. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;124:55-6. https://doi.org/10.1157/13070458

Evans P, McGrory B. Fractures of the proximal femur. Clinical review article. Hosp Physician. 2002:30-8.

Rosenblum S, Zuckerman J, Kummer F, Tam B. A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:352-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587875

Sanjuan-Cerveró R, Suárez-Varela MM, Sanchis-Sanegre J, Fenollosa-Gómez J. A Clinical Comparison between the Gamma® and the Claufitt® Nails in Unstable Proximal Femoral Fractures. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumat. 2007;51:325-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0482-5985(07)75568-2

Halder S. The Gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:340-4. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587873

Heinert G, Parker M. Intramedullary osteosynthesis of complex proximal femoral fractures with the Targon PF nail. Injury. 2007;38:1294-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.05.010

Paraschou S, Anastasopoulos H, Rossas H, Papapanos A, Alexopoulos J, Karanikolas A, et al. Technical errors and complications of gamma nail and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures: Prevention and treatment. Injury. 2009;40:S11-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.07.027

The weight of nations internet. Actualizado en 2012; consultado el 26 de febrero de 2014. Disponible en: http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/news/2012/tackingpopulationweightcrucialforfoodsecurity.html

Nordin M, Frankel VH. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 467.

Bermúdez A, Paoli M. Actividad física determinada por podometría en pacientes con síndrome metabólico. Rev Ven Endocrinol Metabol. 2008;6:24-30.

Eberle S, Gerber C, von Oldenburg G, Hungerer S, Augat P. Type of hip fracture determines load share in intramedullary osteosynthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467: 1972-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0800-3

Heiney J, Battula S, Njus G, Ruble C, Vrabec G. Biomechanical comparison of three second-generation reconstruction nails in an unstable subtrochanteric femur fracture model. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008;222:959-66. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119JEIM369

Pauwels F. Biomechanics of the normal and diseased hip. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66212-6

Published

2016-03-30

How to Cite

1.
Serna Maya I, Toro Restrepo M, Ríos Meneses T, Sierra Navarro D. Biomechanical analysis of a support system for proximal femur nail in an intertrochanteric fracture model. Rev. Colomb. Ortop. Traumatol. [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 30 [cited 2025 May 11];29(3):101-5. Available from: https://revistasccotorg.biteca.online/index.php/rccot/article/view/419

Issue

Section

Original research