Acetabular hip revision surgery with impacted bone grafts: Surgical technique and a case series

Authors

  • Antonio Luis Solano Urrutia Clínica Bautista. Barranquilla, Colombia
  • Raymundo Hernández Martínez Clínica Bautista. Barranquilla, Colombia
  • Gabriel Narváez Carrasquilla Clínica Bautista. Barranquilla, Colombia
  • Fredy Alonso Angarita Maldonado Fundación Universitaria San Martín. Barranquilla, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0120-8845(13)70020-8

Keywords:

arthroplasty, replacement, hip, reoperation, bone transplantation, treatment outcome, evidence level: IV

Abstract

Introduction: Impaction bone grafting technique is useful when the orthopaedic surgeon is faced with large cavitational acetabular defects with compressed particulate bone grafts, followed by insertion of either a cemented or cementless acetabular component. The technically demanding nature of the procedure, mandate the extensive training of the orthopedic surgeon who practiced the procedure.
Method: A case series study was performed from September 2006 to September 2011, including 27 patients with either acetabular or acetabular and femoral revision surgery with slight variations of the technique according to each particular case.
Result: Mean age of patients was 68.3 years (44 to 81). Among all included patients (27 patients), 21 were female and the remaining 6 were male. All prosthetic revision components were cemented. There was only one post-surgery hip dislocation. All cement bone interface radiolucent lines found were less than 1mm in length. A 2mm protrusio was found out in only one acetabular component along the first 2 follow up years, but it stopped by itself without the necessity of any further intervention.
Discussion: When philosophy underneath this surgical procedure is well understood by the surgeon, enough bone graft availability is being assure, a correct selection of candidate patient is performed, and when the procedure is performed by a well-trained orthopedic surgeon, results seems to be adequate to fairly recommend this technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Antonio Luis Solano Urrutia, Clínica Bautista. Barranquilla, Colombia

Ortopedista, Clínica Bautista. Docente de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Fundación Universitaria San Martín, Barranquilla, Colombia.

Raymundo Hernández Martínez, Clínica Bautista. Barranquilla, Colombia

Ortopedista, Clínica Bautista, Barranquilla, Colombia.

Gabriel Narváez Carrasquilla, Clínica Bautista. Barranquilla, Colombia

Ortopedista, Clínica Bautista, Barranquilla, Colombia.

Fredy Alonso Angarita Maldonado, Fundación Universitaria San Martín. Barranquilla, Colombia

Residente de tercer año de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Fundación Universitaria San Martín, Barranquilla, Colombia.

References

Goldring SR, Clark CR, Wright TM. The problem in total joint arthroplasty: aseptic loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75: 799-801. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199306000-00001

Toms AD, Barker RL, Jones RS, Kuiper JH. Impaction bonegrafting in revision joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:2050-60. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200409000-00028

Oakes DA, Cabanela ME. Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and clinical applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:620-8. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200610000-00004

Callaghan JJ, Cuckler JM, Huddleston JI, Galante JO; Implant Wear Symposium 2007 Clinical Work Group. How have alternative bearings (such as metal-on-metal, highly cross-linked polyethylene, and ceramic-on-ceramic) affected the prevention and treatment of osteolysis? J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(1 Suppl 1):S33-S38. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200800001-00008

Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(228):105-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198803000-00016

Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW, Buma P. Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years' experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(393): 202-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200112000-00023

Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Buma P, Verdonschot N. Basic science of bone impaction grafting. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:211-20.

Schreurs BW, Gardeniers JW, Slooff TJ. Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting: 20 years of experience. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:221-8.

Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:14-21. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.75B1.8421012

Slooff TJ, Huiskes R, van Horn J, Lemmens AJ. Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55:593-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678408992402

Scott MS, Paprosky WC, O'Rourke M. Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1620-30. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200507000-00029

Dunlop DG, Brewster NT, Madabhushi SP, Usmani AS, Pankaj P, Howie CR. Techniques to improve the shear strength of impacted bone graft: the effect of particle size and washing of the graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:639-46. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200304000-00009

Linder L. Cancellous impaction grafting in the human femur: histological and radiographic observations in 6 autopsy femurs and 8 biopsies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:543-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317362154

Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(228):105-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198803000-00016

Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Buma P, Gardeniers JW, Huiskes R. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellised cancellous bone graft and cement. A 10- to 15-year follow-up of 60 revision arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:391-5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B3.0800391

Schreurs BW, Bolder SB, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Veth RP. Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15- to 20-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:492-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.86B4.14769

Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, Schimmel JW, Huiskes R, Gardeniers J. Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(324): 108-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199603000-00013

Berry DJ, Chandler HP, Reilly DT. The use of bone allografts in two-stage reconstruction after failure of hip replacements due to infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:1460-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199173100-00003

Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Ling RS. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:809-17 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.85B6.13806

Published

2013-12-25

How to Cite

1.
Solano Urrutia AL, Hernández Martínez R, Narváez Carrasquilla G, Angarita Maldonado FA. Acetabular hip revision surgery with impacted bone grafts: Surgical technique and a case series. Rev. Colomb. Ortop. Traumatol. [Internet]. 2013 Dec. 25 [cited 2025 May 11];27(4):198-204. Available from: https://revistasccotorg.biteca.online/index.php/rccot/article/view/470

Issue

Section

Original research