Evaluation of ankle conventional x-ray as a gold standard on diagnosis and treatment decisions for ankle weber B fractures. Self-controlled multicentric experiment

Authors

  • Sergio Camilo Espinoza-Azula Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Eduardo Antonio Reina-Valdivieso Fundación CIMB, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Bosco Mendoza Centro Médico Dr. Abel Gilbert, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
  • Victor Toledo-Infanson Hospital General Agua Prieta.
  • Carlos Ramirez Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali, Colombia.
  • Juan Manuel Herrera-Arbelaez Fundación CIMB, Bogotá, Colombia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rccot.2020.07.002

Keywords:

ankle fractures, Weber B, radiography, diagnostic test, surgical decision

Abstract

Background: Ankle fractures are one of the main causes of consultation with emergency services around the world, with an incidence of 187 / 100,000 inhabitants per year. The most common is type B in the Weber classification, with a long-term evolution towards osteoarthritis of 14%. Although the diagnosis of distal fibular fracture on an ankle radiograph is very simple, its usefulness has probably been overestimated to provide the necessary insights to decide the appropriate treatment method for the fracture. The objective of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic utility of ankle radiographs and their inter-observer agreement for the treatment decision making in Weber B fractures.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial using three-country surveys of orthopedic surgeons was conducted; orthopedic surgeons and foot and ankle surgeons, were exposed to four Weber B ankle fractures x-ray series where surgery was actually required as the only treatment option. Unilateral and comparative projections, where presented in different time and order to each surgeon, measuring the variability of surgical decisions.
Results: Fifty-one orthopedic surgeons (72.37%), 24 foot and ankle surgeons (15.79%), 4 surgeons of other orthopedic subspecialties (2.63%) and 14 orthopedic surgery residents (9.21%) were surveyed. An inter-observer agreement of 70.83% (p < 0.05) was found in the comparative projections series and 55.31% (p < 0.05) in the unilateral ones. When performing linear regression between the training degree, years of experience and the provenance country of the surgeons, no causality was found (power of < 95%). Nevertheless, 100% of the respondents diagnosed the fracture of the distal fibula as a Weber B fracture.
Discussion: The unilateral and comparative radiographic series are not recommended for making an adequate surgical decision in Weber B ankle fractures, given their very low interobserver agreement. For decision making in Weber B ankle fractures it is necessary to take other complementary examinations such as Computed Axial Tomography.
Evidence Level: II

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sergio Camilo Espinoza-Azula, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.

Posgrado de Ortopedia y Traumatología Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.

Eduardo Antonio Reina-Valdivieso, Fundación CIMB, Bogotá, Colombia.

Medicina Física y Rehabilitación Fundación CIMB, Bogotá, Colombia.

Bosco Mendoza, Centro Médico Dr. Abel Gilbert, Guayaquil, Ecuador.

Ortopedia y Traumatología deportiva Centro Médico Dr. Abel Gilbert, Guayaquil, Ecuador.

Victor Toledo-Infanson, Hospital General Agua Prieta.

Ortopedia y Traumatología Hospital General Agua Prieta / Clínica América. Agua Prieta-Sonora-México.

Carlos Ramirez, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali, Colombia.

Cirugía de pie y Tobillo Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali, Colombia.

Juan Manuel Herrera-Arbelaez, Fundación CIMB, Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirugía de Pie y Tobillo Universidad El Bosque / Fundación CIMB, Bogotá, Colombia.

References

Mandi DM, Ankle fractures. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2012;29:155-8.

Pelaez L, Reina E, Rangel C, Reyes O, Herrera JM. Impacto de la rehabilitación precoz para la osteosíntesis con placa antideslizante en pacientes con fracturas de tobillo Weber B. Rev Col Or Tra. 2015;29:123-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rccot.2016.03.005.

Hernandez N, Alvarez G, Bravo F, Vieira JC, Reina EA, Herrera JM. Validación de la prueba de Romberg Modificada para la determinación del tiempo de propicepción inconsciente en adultos sanos. Rev Col Or Tara. 2018;32:93-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rccot.2017.11.001.

Peláez L, Reina E, Herrera JM. Luxofracturas de Tobillo. Rev Lat Ort. 2014;2:61-78.

Pelaez L, Reina E, Reyes O, Herrera JM. Resultados funcionales de la técnica con placa antideslizante versus técnica de placa lateral para el tratamiento quirúrgico de fracturas del maléolo externo tipo Weber B seguimiento a 5 años. Rev Col Or Tra. 2015;29:106-16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rccot.2016.02.007.

Angus DeatonVander Griend R, Michelson JD, Bone LB. Fractures of the ankle and the distal part of the tibia. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:311-21.

Ramsey P, Hamilton W. Changes in tibiotalar contact caused by lateral talar shift. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1976;58-A:356-7.

Lloyd J, Elsayed S, Hariharan K, Tanaka H. Revisiting the concept of Talar Shift in Ankle Fractures. Foot&Ankle int. 2006;27:793-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107110070602701006.

Harris J, Fallat L. Efects Of isolated Weber B fibular fractures on the tibiotalar contact area. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:3-9.

Klein P1, Mattys S, Rooze M. Moment arm length variations of selected muscles acting on talocrural and subtalar joints during movement: an in vitro study. J Biomech. 1996;29:21-30.

Herrera JM. Artroplastia de tobillo estado del arte. Parte I. Rev Col Or Tra. 2008;22:247-60.

Donken CC1, Al-Khateeb H, Verhofstad MH, van Laarhoven CJ. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating ankle fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 15;8. CD008470.

Thomas RH, Daniels TR. Ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:923-36.

Glazebrook M, Daniels T, Younger A, Foote CJ, Penner M, Wing K, Lau J, Leighton R, Dunbar M. Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:499-505.

Russo A, Reginelli A, Zappia M, Rossi C, Fabozzi G, Cerrato M, Macarini L, Coppolino F. Ankle fracture: radiographic approach according to the Lauge-Hansen classification. Musculoskelet Surg. 2013;97:S155-60.

Meijer DT, Doornberg JN, Sierevelt IN, Mallee WH, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM, Stufkens SA. Et All, Guesstimation of posterior malleolar fractures on lateral plain radiographs. Injury. 2015;46:2024-9.

Donken CC1, van Laarhoven CJ, Edwards MJ, Verhofstad MH. Misdiagnosis of OTA type B (Weber B) ankle fractures leading to nonunion. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:430-3.

Yeo ED1, Kim HJ2, Cho WI3, Lee YK. A Specialized Fibular Locking Plate for Lateral Malleolar Fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:1067-71.

Holguin E, Herrera JM, Reyes OE, Mesa J. Manejo de fracturas de tobillo Weber B con placas antideslizantes. Rev Col Or Tra. 2008;22:117-21.

Published

2020-09-02

How to Cite

1.
Espinoza-Azula SC, Reina-Valdivieso EA, Mendoza B, Toledo-Infanson V, Ramirez C, Herrera-Arbelaez JM. Evaluation of ankle conventional x-ray as a gold standard on diagnosis and treatment decisions for ankle weber B fractures. Self-controlled multicentric experiment. Rev. Colomb. Ortop. Traumatol. [Internet]. 2020 Sep. 2 [cited 2025 May 10];34(3):212-2. Available from: https://revistasccotorg.biteca.online/index.php/rccot/article/view/203

Issue

Section

Original research